Comments on: From 700MB to 4.7Gigs! http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:56:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: ember http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-659 ember Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:36:37 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-659 lol, you havent seen the whole thing, it's in a big mess but thanks :D lol, you havent seen the whole thing, it’s in a big mess
but thanks :D

]]> By: Elimi'Xed http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-658 Elimi'Xed Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:32:33 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-658 Looks pretty cool, nice setup you got there :D Looks pretty cool, nice setup you got there :D

]]> By: ember http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-657 ember Sat, 02 Jul 2005 02:32:00 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-657 vincent, thanks for the advice. I had suspected that it is because of the USB port too. Sucks that USB 2.0 is gonna be expensive. Gah! LcF, nope, only shitty USB 1.1 :( vincent, thanks for the advice. I had suspected that it is because of the USB port too. Sucks that USB 2.0 is gonna be expensive. Gah!

LcF, nope, only shitty USB 1.1 :(

]]> By: LcF http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-656 LcF Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:19:16 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-656 the size is really BIG... your PC does not has USB 2.0 port? the size is really BIG…
your PC does not has USB 2.0 port?

]]> By: vincent http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-655 vincent Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:27:19 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-655 That's because yours is an external writer. It burns at a much slower speed than your writer specs because of the slow data transfer through the USB port. If you want to speed it up, get a USB2 port (which is damn expensive). That’s because yours is an external writer. It burns at a much slower speed than your writer specs because of the slow data transfer through the USB port. If you want to speed it up, get a USB2 port (which is damn expensive).

]]> By: ember http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-654 ember Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:54:33 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-654 9 minutes? WTF? What speed are you burning at? I'm new to this DVD+R burning scene, thats why I didnt know how long will it take to burn 4.7GB (not even roughly). But, damn, 9 minutes? compared to my 100 mins, its a crying shame indeed :( 9 minutes? WTF? What speed are you burning at? I’m new to this DVD+R burning scene, thats why I didnt know how long will it take to burn 4.7GB (not even roughly). But, damn, 9 minutes? compared to my 100 mins, its a crying shame indeed :(

]]> By: Silencers http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/comment-page-1/#comment-653 Silencers Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:41:39 +0000 http://tehcpeng.net/2005/07/02/from-700mb-to-47gigs/#comment-653 That's odd, and a crying shame, too. I'm using an internal DVD burner [also Lite-ON] and it only took me 9 minutes to burn 4.7GB [add another 5 minutes for verification] onto a DVD+R. That’s odd, and a crying shame, too. I’m using an internal DVD burner [also Lite-ON] and it only took me 9 minutes to burn 4.7GB [add another 5 minutes for verification] onto a DVD+R.

]]>